Kebijakan Editorial

Fokus dan Ruang Lingkup

Jurnal Teknika yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Teknik Universitas Islam Lamongan ini,  mencakup bahasan mengenai :

  1. Data Mining
  2. Electric Control
  3. Telecommunication
  4. Power System Analysis
  5. Electric and Microprocessor
  6. Cloud Computing
  7. Jaringan Komputer
  8. Algoritma
  9. Rekayasa Perangkat lunak
  10. Rekayasa Geoteknik
  11. Rekayasa Keairan
  12. Rekayasa Struktur
  13. Manajemen Konstruksi dan Perencanaan yang berkaitan dengan Teknik Sipil

yang diterbitkan dua kali dalam satu tahun yaitu pada periode Maret dan September, setiap terbit jurnal memuat sebanyak 8 artikel yang sesuai topik. jurnal ini memiliki akses online mulai tahun 2016, tepatnya pada edisi 8 No.2 tahun 2016. Saat ini sudah memiliki ISSN Online Terdaftar di LIPI dengan nomor 2620-4770


Kebijakan Bagian

Teknika Sistem dan Informasi

Jurnal Teknika is a peer-reviewed journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewer­­­­­s and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Jurnal Teknika is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.

Lembaga Penelitian, Pengembangan, dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LP3M) Universitas Islam Lamongan as publisher of Jurnal Teknika takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the LP3M UNISLA and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editors of the Jurnal Teknika are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.


Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.


Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Centang Naskah Terbuka Centang Diindeks Centang Telah di-Peer review

Proses Peer Review

Setiap naskah yang masuk, akan dicek plagiasi dan selanjutnya akan dikirimkan kepada reviewer, satu paper akan di review minimal 2(dua) reviewer sesuai bidang dan topik yang dibahas pada naskah. Lama waktu yang diberikan pada reviewer untuk meriview naskah adalah selama 2 minggu.

Untuk itu para penulis supaya melakukan submit sesuai dengan jadwal yang telah di informasikan dan menyesuaikan sesuai dengan template. Artikel akan dikembalikan atau ditolak jika terindikasi plagiasi dan telah disubmit di jurnal lain sebelumnya. Artikel yang selesai direvisi dan dikirim ulang ke kami, dan selanjutnya penulis dapat menyelesaikan biaya publikasi sebelum jurnal tebit.


Frekuensi Penerbitan

Penerbitan Jurnal:

  • Penerbitan jurnal Bulan Maret
  1. Pendaftaran jurnal dimulai bulan November
  2. Pengumpulan/upload template 1 Desember sampai dengan 1 Januari
  3. reviewer jurnal bulan Januari-Februari
  4. Finalisasi naskah yang akan diterbitan 
  5. Publish bulan Maret
  • Penerbitan jurnal Bulan September
  1. Pendaftaran jurnal dimulai bulan Mei
  2. pengumpulan/upload template 1 Juni sampai dengan 1 Juli
  3. Reviewer jurnal bulan Juli-Agustus
  4. Finalisasi naskah yang akan diterbitan 
  5. Publish bulan September


Kebijakan Akses Terbuka

Jurnal Teknika ini memberikan akses terbuka bagi para pengunjung, dapat digunakan sebagai bahan referensi pada penelitian selanjutnya sesuai dengan kebutuhan bagi para pembaca. Dengan tersedianya akses terbuka ini diharapkan semua artikel yang telah dipublis dapat memberikan sumbangsih yang lebih besar pada riset bidang teknik.